In a distant past (1999 – 2002) I worked at a CMS vendor. In those 3 years I travelled around Europe and experienced a few customers with projects that did not end up meeting expectations and consequently sooner or later they decided to change CMS (again).
After a short stint in a different market (content security), I founded my company back in 2003. Initially I did mostly consulting. In my first speaking engagements in my new vendor-neutral role, I repeatedly mentioned that the CMS industry was young and immature. Back in 2003 I remember industry pundits saying that on average organisations change their CMS every 3 – 5 years.
Fast forward to late 2008. It has been more than 5 years and as an organisation we help many enterprises around the world selecting the right CMS. This year it will be about 20 public or private organisations alone and very few of those have had their CMS for more than 5 years. When I spoke at Geneva Web Group in early October, the audience seemed shocked when I started my presentation by saying that they should not plan for their CMS to be used longer than 3 years. Earlier this week I talked to the CIO of a large Danish company which selected a commercial CMS in 2004, but in 2007 migrated to a home-grown solution and are now again working on selecting a new CMS.
I’ve certainly learned much over the last 10 years in this industry. The CMS marketplace has also matured somewhat, but here’s the main reason you will probably change your CMS in 3 years:
- Your requirements will be substantially different in 2012
- You might realize that your current CMS has too many shortcomings
- Upgrading to a new version might be more expensive than changing to another CMS
- Your CMS vendor might go bankrupt, get acquired and consequently product development might stop
Selecting the wrong CMS will only make matters worse, but my key advise here is to set the right expectation and also avoid strategic enterprise deals.
J. Boye » Blog Archive » Are you still using Microsoft CMS 2002? January 14th, 2009 21:37
[...] You’ll find this not just here in Aarhus, Denmark, but around the world: Microsoft CMS 2002 SP2, which is the most recent and final release from Microsoft, is still actively in use in many organisations, which have been busy doing other things than upgrading to SharePoint 2007 or changing their CMS every 3 years. [...]
J. Boye » Blog Archive » Fewer web editors is better for your website January 15th, 2009 21:37
[...] to another task before they become comfortable in writing for the web and using the system. With a new CMS every 3 years, most casual web editors don’t really become proficient in the system, before a new system is [...]
Should CMIS Impact Purchasing Now? « Word of Pie March 16th, 2009 21:37
[...] will probably change your CMS again in 3 years and by then CMIS may well be a more mature [...]
J. Boye » Blog Archive » 10 years with web content management - some inconvenient truths April 8th, 2009 21:37
[...] The real horizon for most systems is no more than 3 years – on average organisations change their CMS every 3 years [...]
» Why IT should not run a CMS selection project - J. Boye » Blog July 31st, 2009 21:37
[...] to last many years, facts are that in the still immature CMS marketplace, most will procure a new CMS every three years. Consequently, you should focus on your current, basic requirements; not on which features you may [...]
» New Sitecore version – why bother? - J. Boye » Blog August 11th, 2009 21:37
[...] integrated in the CMS is a good thing entirely. What happens if you decide to change CMS, something which roughly happens every third year? This might be just yet another attempt from a vendor to try and differentiate themselves while [...]