<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Use EPiServer for your website and keep SharePoint behind the firewall</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jboye.com/blogpost/episerver-for-website-keep-sharepoint-behind-firewall/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jboye.com/blogpost/episerver-for-website-keep-sharepoint-behind-firewall/</link>
	<description>The international community for web and intranet professionals</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 19:45:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: WCM: How important is the vendor eco-system? &#124; Philadelphia 2010 News &#124; J. Boye Conferences</title>
		<link>http://jboye.com/blogpost/episerver-for-website-keep-sharepoint-behind-firewall/comment-page-1/#comment-4002</link>
		<dc:creator>WCM: How important is the vendor eco-system? &#124; Philadelphia 2010 News &#124; J. Boye Conferences</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 May 2010 22:30:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jboye.com/?p=735#comment-4002</guid>
		<description>[...] avoided by speaking to other customers. We have shared a few case studies on our blog, e.g. on how Danish Rail use EPiServer for their website and keep SharePoint behind the firewall or DIY SharePoint as a local [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] avoided by speaking to other customers. We have shared a few case studies on our blog, e.g. on how Danish Rail use EPiServer for their website and keep SharePoint behind the firewall or DIY SharePoint as a local [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J. Boye &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Is SharePoint really a less risky choice than better alternatives?</title>
		<link>http://jboye.com/blogpost/episerver-for-website-keep-sharepoint-behind-firewall/comment-page-1/#comment-365</link>
		<dc:creator>J. Boye &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Is SharePoint really a less risky choice than better alternatives?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 11:08:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jboye.com/?p=735#comment-365</guid>
		<description>[...] standards, accessibility, search and public websites. It is now more common for organisations to use SharePoint behind the firewall in organisations and then use something else for the public website. If you find that SharePoint [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] standards, accessibility, search and public websites. It is now more common for organisations to use SharePoint behind the firewall in organisations and then use something else for the public website. If you find that SharePoint [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Parfitt</title>
		<link>http://jboye.com/blogpost/episerver-for-website-keep-sharepoint-behind-firewall/comment-page-1/#comment-220</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Parfitt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 09:15:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jboye.com/?p=735#comment-220</guid>
		<description>Thanks for this blog post - it&#039;s interesting to get a top-level insight into the DSB site.

The only point that I strongly disagree with is at the start of the third paragraph: &quot;EPiServer has grown in recent years, yet it can still be hard to find experienced implementation partners outside Sweden&quot;.

EPiServer now has over 250 partners around the world.  There are still some countries where partner support is light but here in the UK there are over 35 partners including my company, Netcel, which is one of four UK companies accredited as an EPiServer Premium Partner.  We have developed and now support over 15 EPiServer sites for clients.  Other UK partners have similar levels of client engagements.

So although I agree that partner support cannot be found in all European countries, your statement that &quot;it can still be hard to find experienced implementation partners outside Sweden&quot; is factually incorrect.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for this blog post &#8211; it&#8217;s interesting to get a top-level insight into the DSB site.</p>
<p>The only point that I strongly disagree with is at the start of the third paragraph: &#8220;EPiServer has grown in recent years, yet it can still be hard to find experienced implementation partners outside Sweden&#8221;.</p>
<p>EPiServer now has over 250 partners around the world.  There are still some countries where partner support is light but here in the UK there are over 35 partners including my company, Netcel, which is one of four UK companies accredited as an EPiServer Premium Partner.  We have developed and now support over 15 EPiServer sites for clients.  Other UK partners have similar levels of client engagements.</p>
<p>So although I agree that partner support cannot be found in all European countries, your statement that &#8220;it can still be hard to find experienced implementation partners outside Sweden&#8221; is factually incorrect.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

