Tag Archives: adobe

Everything you need to know about Adobe Experience Manager


The recent meeting in our European Adobe Experience Manager (AEM) User Group served as a useful reminder for several of our members, that all the good Adobe AEM (formerly known as CQ5) knowledge is spread on different groups, mailing lists and blogs.

This posting has pointers to where you can find answers to your questions and stay up-to-date. The listing is created with very helpful input from our members and intended to serve as the central place that previous product owners has failed to foster.

If you know any resource that is missing, please feel free to leave a comment below.

Tagged , | 2 Comments

Big Web CMS vendors in 2007 and 2012


What a difference 5 years can make! Much has happened in the crowded and still young CMS marketplace since 2007, but contrary to what most analysts expected, the number of CMS vendors has not gone down. New vendors have emerged, local vendors have successfully gone international and on top of that, many of the large software companies that were largely uninterested in CMS back in 2007 are now investing heavily in the market.

As a buyer it can be confusing and difficult to stay updated on the rapid market developments, so I made a slide showing who the big vendors were in 2007 and what the picture looks like today for a recent J. Boye group meeting.

Large, global and complex organisations tend to gravitate towards the big vendors. As one of our members put it:

Elephants buy from elephants

The elephants: The big CMS vendors in 2007 and 2012. Click for a larger version

The elephants: The big CMS vendors in 2007 and 2012. Click for a larger version

Consolidation has only happened to the extent that vendors have bought other vendors. With just a few exceptions all the products have been kept alive, so today several of the above have more than one Web CMS as a part of their offering.

Finally, a look at the big vendor websites won't get you far in terms of figuring out more about their CMS offerings. They may be big vendors, but they also offer many other solutions and CMS is apparently not on top of their list. Here's the CMS products from each:

Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 5 Comments

Intranet analytics: Which tool to use?


Guy Van LeemputAre you one of the many intranet managers struggling to measure the impact and success of your organization's intranet? Are you being asked by senior management to quantify its value and build a business case for your next intranet project?

Tagged , , , , , , | 7 Comments

Adobe buys Day – What it means for customers


The vendor famous for bringing us PDF-files, Adobe Systems, announced their intention to acquire CMS-vendor Day Software last week. Day had been rumoured as an acquisition candidate for a while, but not by Adobe. The acquisition is expected to close in December and with the unanimous support of the Board of Directors of Day, this looks like a done deal.

As usual when this happens, the vendor to be acquired is very optimistic about the future prospects. To quote from a message to Day Software customer and partners:

this will serve as a new catalyst for Day to accelerate our investment in product innovation, our customer community, and our global ecosystem of channel and technology partners

The Day management team is understandably in a happy mood, but when it comes to product improvements, Day really has a case to prove over the coming months. Most in our community did not see this as good news for the product or for the standards that Day has been championing. I've been talking to customers in the past weeks and here is our take on what the acquisition could mean to customers:

  • Until the deal has been closed, Day will continue to operate as a separate company with its own partner and customer community
  • Product updates are likely to be delayed: Day is known for letting itself distract by such things as open source and standard involvements with less focus on delivering a solid and easy-to-use product. It will now inevitably be seriously distracted for a while, whilst getting to know the ins and outs of the new owner and whilst trying to teach a large sales force how to work enterprise web content management deals.
  • Don't expect CQ5, Day's main product, to receive much attention inside Adobe. To put things in perspective,  Day is a very small fish indeed next to the whale that is Adobe. Adobe has 8,600 employees compared to Day's less than 150. Compared to previous acquisitions by Adobe, e.g. Macromedia (1,400 employees) and Omniture (>1,000 employees), this is quite a small deal.
  • No overlap with existing Adobe products. Quite unlike recent industry acquisitions, e.g. when Open Text bought Vignette or when Oracle bought Sun, there seems to be no product overlap. As part of the expected integration of the two companies, Day will operate as a product line within Adobe's Digital Enterprise Solutions Business Unit
  • Adobe emphasised integrating proprietary technologies such as Air and Flash in the acquisition announcement and did not mention anything about Day's work on standards. This was quite worrying to several Day customers.
  • CQ5 moving down in the market. At the moment CQ5 is overkill for anything but complex and global websites. Expect that to change when Adobe begins to put its engineering footprint on the product.

What should you do as a customer?

  1. Use the change and added uncertainty to get discounted rates or freebies. Day has an expensive product but is known to be flexible on licensing models
  2. Keep reminding your Day Software contacts of your existance, while they are busy closing the deal. Expect some new faces in 2011 as the organisational integration kicks in and as always make sure you get an experienced team on your project.
  3. Prepare to listen to some funny stories from the competitors. Usually some use an opportunity like this to spread some good old FUD (fear, uncertainty and doubt). Fellow Swiss-vendor Magnolia have already started this with a public blog: Day to be acquired by Adobe - implications?

More detailed and interesting coverage of the deal:

and finally for extra credits read: In defence of PDF, an interesting perspective from a new Day employee saying that "Day has a strong prejudice in favor of HTML as the one true and proper Web format for documents".

Tagged , , | 1 Comment