Tag Archives: annual report

Sitecore annual report: a very successful software company

Share

It somehow slipped my radar that WCM-vendor Sitecore released their annual report back in November. Once again they managed to post record numbers with increasing revenue, profit and capital base. Revenue is now at DKK 131 million (up from DKK 79 million) with net earnings at DKK 38 million (up from DKK 18 million). The reported headcount has also gone up to more than 125 employees worldwide from 92 employees. For the whole Sitecore Group, revenue amounted to DKK 217 million, and total headcount was 200.

With growth in all markets and recent office openings in Germany and Japan, Sitecore has come along way from their start in Denmark. Apart from the purely geographical spread, it seems like Sitecore now wants to spread its wings further and grow their implementation revenue and extend their success beyond the web content management marketplace.

I spoke to Sitecore Chief Operating Officer Kim Elsass, about the annual report and recent developments. According to Kim, North America has become the largest market for Sitecore, while the traditional Danish home market is continuing to grow.

Those online professionals really interested in the numbers, will notice that in the UK and US, Sitecore is operating using partially owned subsidiaries. These send part of their profit back to Copenhagen and somewhat complicate the picture when reading the annual report. According to Kim, Sitecore is working on simplifying the ownership structure. From a buyer's perspective, we don't see this having any significant impact on day-to-day business.

Kim also confirmed that based on requests from enterprise buyers who wants Sitecore to assume more implementation responsibility, Sitecore is planning to offer more implementation services. Sitecore is still planning to keep their 700+ partners happy by not offering to do implementations without a partner, but by playing a larger role in the implementation going forward, e.g. by offering architectural reviews or performance tuning  Most competing WCM vendors, e.g. Ektron, already have strong professional service divisions.

In the past we've seen examples of substantial discounts offered on Sitecore licenses, but evidently this has not hurt Sitecore financially. Perhaps to the contrary, Sitecore is using attractive license offers to keep their eco-system of agencies and implementation partners busy and happy.

Finally, the annual report and the conversation with Kim, confirmed that Sitecore is taking a quite broad view of web content management to also include online marketing, e-mail campaigns and intranet portals. More product launches are planned for the coming months.

Will Sitecore be able to continue the success and beat their own numbers once again? Feel free to share your thoughts below.

Tagged , | Leave a comment

Why the finances of software vendors matter

Share

color_graphI've regularly covered annual reports, earnings announcements and other financial news about software vendors. These commentaries tend to stir debate and I am frequently asked why I bother to look behind the numbers. Is it really important?

Many vendors, in particular privately-held US-based ones, don't publicly release audited numbers. Instead they carefully select a few positive numbers to share via a press release. An example of this is seemingly successful CMS-vendor Ektron, which claims to be open and transparent, but will tell you only that their sales grew 38%. If you are willing to sign a non-disclosure agreement, they'll share more details on profitability, but can a vendor really claim to be transparent when you need to sign a contract to get some fundamental numbers about the financial health of the vendor?

In my view financial numbers and annual reports are a great way to gain insights about a vendor. These are the numbers you should indeed care about:

  • Services revenue. A good example of this is FatWire, where your local key account manager might have told you that they are very committed to their partners, when in fact services bring in about 30% of the company's total revenue.
  • New license sales. If this is down, it will tell you that the vendor is having difficulty signing up new customers. This can be a sign that an acquisition is lurking around the corner, which is what happened to Vignette as they got acquired by Open Text.
  • Maintenance and support revenue. If this makes up a large part of revenue, it means that the vendor has many customers who keep using the product. If you can get hold of a renewal percentage or average customer lifetime, it will tell you something about how long the customers stay with the product.
  • A break-down of revenue by product will tell you which products are really strategic to the vendor. IBM and Google are examples of big vendors, to who far from all products are equally important. This might reveal which products are likely to become discontinued. This happened with Microsoft CMS
  • Cash is king. Look at the cashflow to find out whether the vendor might be facing survival problems or is sitting on a pile of cash.

After looking at a few vendors, you'll discover that the accounting models tend to differ hugely. Some will list licence sales straight away, while others will break it down and only list it partially over a given period. Some might also divide their revenue between a corporate entity and different geographic regions, e.g. CMS vendor Sitecore. Details like this obviously make it difficult to compare the numbers.

Finally, I would say that the past decade has showed that positive financial numbers by no means guarantee that your favourite vendor will not be acquired or that your favourite product will not be discontinued. 2009 saw quite a few acquisitions, most notably Adobe's acquisition of  Omniture and Opentext which bought Vignette. I'm sure we will see more in 2010. These might not impact customers in the short-term, but down the road, they always also have significant impact, e.g. with closed regional offices, a new partner strategy or a cut in engineering spending.

Tagged , , , , , , , , | 5 Comments

Sitecore posts record numbers again

Share

SitecoreEarlier this month Danish CMS vendor Sitecore released their annual report showing record profits and revenue. Compared to last year (see our comment), revenue went up from DKK 56 million to DKK 79 million and profit increased  from DKK 20 million to 25 million. Sitecore has also grown from 120 to 160 employees worldwide.

For some reason, the Sitecore press release is currently only available in Danish and the annual report is nowhere to be found on the English version of the Sitecore site. Apart from the numbers, Sitecore uses the press release to make some other statements:

  1. Sitecore is among the global CMS top 3
  2. Analyst firm Gartner has crowned Sitecore as the most visionary vendor in the world
  3. CMS consolidation will continue in 2010

I'll simply say that I suspect the lack of translation is not to hide the annual report from competitors, but rather to avoid global ridicule with these hard-to-believe claims.

I have taken some time to study the annual report and the numbers contained in order to explore what is in store for Sitecore customers. Here my comments:

  • License sales is almost DKK 76 million out of the DKK 79 million revenue, with the majority of the remaining revenue being training courses.
  • Sitecore is far from the only vendor doing well in the current financial climate. US direct competitor Ektron is also doing very well and so are Java-based alternatives Day Software and FatWire
  • According to the annual report, Sitecore has used the past year to set up shop in The Netherlands and in Sweden. With strong local competition (Tridion and EPiServer respectively), the new office in Sweden lost DKK 500.000 while the Dutch subsidiary was profitable
  • In the coming fiscal year, Sitecore is planning to continue the quest for world domination and establish themselves in Japan

Sitecore have also just announced their very first live customer on their much promoted Online Marketing Suite. To my surprise this was a government customer - National Consumer Agency of Denmark - and I can only imagine how relieved Sitecore is to finally have a real OMS reference. OMS was a topic in a recent J. Boye group meeting and for our take on OMS, see Peter Sejersens critical analysis: New Sitecore version – why bother?

Throughout 2009 Sitecore have also worked hard on addressing shortcomings when it comes to cross-browser support. According to Sitecore, the desktop interface, which has previously only worked in IE, will soon be released in an updated version with support for the Chrome and Firefox browsers.

Finally, I suspect Sitecore will have  a more difficult year ahead in 2010. The Danish home market is seeing increasing Umbraco adoption, an open-source .NET alternative, and I suspect many loyal Sitecore partners will be tempted to offer Umbraco and get a bigger chunk of the budget for implementation. Outside Denmark every major competitor already has OMS-like offerings, so unless Sitecore can come up with a real differentiator, I would recommend that buyers look at the price. At the moment Sitecore is substantially more expensive than competing vendors such as Ektron, EPiServer and Kentico and I'm wondering if this will continue throughout 2010?

Tagged , | 7 Comments

Composite hit by big losses

Share

CompositeDanish CMS vendor Composite has reported a loss of almost EUR 1 million in their latest annual report, down from a tiny profit of EUR 4,000 last year. Revenue increased 5 % from a year earlier to EUR 1,8 million.

Composite cites high development costs, structural changes and a new office in the Netherlands as the main reasons for the loss. According to the annual report, Composite broke a few accounting laws and has accumulated quite some debt during the year, including EUR 450,000 to banks. Unfortunately, Composite was also hit by fraud by a former employee and stock holder. Composite is a small vendor with 22 employees.

Another interesting development is their relaunched website, which is now in English-only. Even though Composite does not break down revenue by countries, I suspect that a significant majority of their revenue is still from Denmark. This is much like another local and better known vendor, Sitecore, which also has abandoned the Danish language, although to be fair Sitecore are more international both in terms of ambitions and presence. Interestingly, Composite's rebranded website has 5 news stories from April, but no mention of  the recent earnings.

In Denmark, Composite competes mainly with Dynamicweb for customers with small to medium sites. In comparison, Dynamicweb barely broke even in their latest annual report based on EUR 8 million in revenue, substantially more than Composite.

If you are considering buying software from Composite, talking to other customers is naturally a good idea. Based on the annual report, I also strongly recommend that you request additional details on their financial health. It does seem like the company is in a crisis and this might help you get a better deal, but you might also want to consider your options carefully.

Will Composite be able to recover from the crisis? As always, it is you the customer that ultimately decides.

UPDATE May 1st 2009: The initial posting could be interpreted as saying that "fraud by a former employee and stock holder" was one of the contributing factors to the loss. To clarify: The annual report does not state that the fraud is related to the loss.

Tagged , | 3 Comments

Annual Report: IBM – where do you want to go today?

Share

IBM logoIBM recently released their annual report for 2008 achieving record revenue, record pre-tax earnings, record earnings per share and record free cash flow. IBM has grown tremendously and now does USD 103 billion in annual revenue (up 5 % from last year) with almost 400,000 employees around the world. Despite the record-breaking  numbers Big Blue seems a bit lost when it comes to enterprise portals, web content management and enterprise search.

I'll leave it to other industry analysts and observers to speculate about the potential impact of IBM's rumoured upcoming acquisition of Sun. Rather, I want to share my findings from simply looking at the numbers and talking to curious customers who -just like myself- are wondering where IBM might be taking their many web products in the future.

IBM do not detail specific product line revenue, but they do share many interesting details in the 128 page annual report:

  • Revenue for the very large WebSphere family of products grew 6.2 % from last year.
  • Roughly 21 % of over-all revenue comes from software and more than half of this is  from the middleware division where WebSphere belongs.
  • IBM have several and overlapping answers to web content management, including WebSphere Portal, FileNet and Lotus Web Content Management. The acquisition of FileNet in August 2006 is briefly mentioned in the report
  • Global Services, the IBM division which primarily does consulting and outsourcing, contributed with USD 58 billion revenue. In other words Global Services is a very significant part of IBM.

Interestingly, IBM are very optimistic about the future. To quote a chapter called "We Will Emerge Stronger" in the annual report: "...we will not simply ride out the storm. Rather, we will take a long-term view, and go on offence."

Perhaps the good numbers and the bright take on the future, means that IBM are not feeling any pressure from Microsoft SharePoint? So far, the biggest single piece of news in 2009 with IBM WebSphere Portal and Lotus Web Content Management has been the February announcement of a new "pay-as-you-go" model via cloud computing with Amazon Web Services. I have still not found any customers that have gone in this direction, so to me this is still left in the marketing folder.

Customers of IBM's portal, web content management and enterprise search solutions might want to take note of the fact that these are barely mentioned in this year's annual report. For me this is a useful reminder that IBM is a vast company and these solutions represent but a fraction of overall revenue. This is very similar to Google and their tiny Enterprise business.

While there is no indication that IBM is planning to discontinue any of these solutions, I recommend that existing and prospective customers have a conversation with their usual IBM executives to get details on local adoption by other organisations and product roadmap plans. If you are concerned about taking unnecessary risks, make sure to also talk to several system integrators that are able to support your projects and have experience with the same IBM product that you are using.

"Where do you want to go today?" was the title of Microsoft's famous advertising campaign back in 1994. My concern is that IBM, on the face of it, has very overlapping web products that do not seem strategic to IBM. Unfortunately they do not openly communicate where they are going and that's usually a sign of bad news to come, at least for existing for customers.

UPDATE - March 25, 2009: The Wall Street Journal reports IBM Set to Cut More U.S. Jobs

Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Annual Report: FatWire reports profitable year and revenue increase

Share

FatWire logoLast week the Long Island-based CMS vendor FatWire distributed a press release reporting its fourth consecutive year of increasing year-on-year profitability and a 40 % increase in 2008 revenue. Revenue now stands at $44 million, divided between roughly 40 % license revenue, 30 % services revenue and 30 % maintenance revenue.

With the current financial crisis, it is impressive that FatWire is growing its profits. With few exceptions competing vendors are either shrinking (e.g. Vignette) or getting acquired (e.g. Interwoven). A part of the reason may be the quite unusual revenue mix for a US vendor in this space; only 40% of the revenue is from North America, 50% is coming from Europe and the remaining 10% from rest of world.

FatWire is differentiating itself from the many other vendors in the still crowded CMS marketplace by positioning itself as a Web Experience Management vendor. I always find it interesting when small vendors attempt to define new terms and new markets. I have still not met a buyer with a Web Experience Management budget, but evidently the strategy is working as new customers are signing up.

From talking to customers, FatWire often likes to work via partners; some more experienced than others. With services bringing in $13 million revenue, FatWire is evidently also working directly with quite a few customers. Perhaps Web Experience Management projects require special skills? According to FatWire they are working on rolling out a new global partner certification scheme.

A closer look at the press release and a discussion earlier today with FatWire CEO Yogesh Gupta and other recent briefings with FatWire resulted in the following findings:

  • Revenue is up in all geographies, including the US
  • Average licence deal is now at $200,000
  • The 200+ employees are spread out in 8 global sales offices, 6 different support centers and 4 engineering teams in New York, Kiev, Vienna and New Delhi.

Critical buyers should note that unlike other successful privately-held vendors, e.g. Sitecore, FatWire has not released an audited annual report, but simply decided to share a few numbers via a press release. The company has opened up compared to previous years by publicly releasing their revenue figure and if you are interested in further details, I recommend that you talk directly to FatWire, who might be willing to share additional, and perhaps even audited numbers.

Tagged , , | 2 Comments

Annual Report: Dynamicweb barely breaks even

Share

Earlier this week Danish CMS vendor Dynamicweb released their annual report. Dynamicweb reported DKK 60 million in revenue, but a profit of only 110.000 DKK. Dynamicweb cites higher than expected costs in relation to the Synkron acquisition in March 2007 as the main reason for the small profit. As reported on CMS Watch, the acquisition was more or less completed back in July 2007, but apparently costs has continued to arise. I suspect that license sales of the higher-end Synkron Via have been very slow, but unfortunately Dynamicweb does not break down the software revenue of their 2 very different content management systems.

Revenues were up 19 % compared to the previous fiscal year, which is not much in this market. To compare, local competitor Sitecore recently reported almost DKK 90 million in fiscal year revenue and more than 100 % revenue growth. Remember that while the revenue number from Sitecore is almost entirely software licenses, Dynamicweb also sells other services including hosting, internet marketing and outsourcing. Again, unfortunately Dynamicweb does not provide a detailed breakdown, so it is impossible to estimate the actual revenue on software licenses.

In these times with a crisis in finance, it is also worth noting that Dynamicweb has quite some debt, including DKK 13 million to banks.

The annual report moreover mentions the international expansion. Dynamicweb is sold internationally via local subsidiaries (Norway and Sweden) or distributors (e.g. Japan, Greece and Spain). Finally the roadmap for Dynamicweb CMS is highlighted. It is stated that a major new release is due out shortly.

Dynamicweb has never been a very open company. Unlike Sitecore, Dynamicweb still has no press release or similar notice with additional information about their annual report on the Dynamicweb website. Beyond detailed revenue numbers, I was unable to find an updated employee count.

It does not seem like Dynamicweb is in a crisis, but if you are considering buying Dynamicweb CMS, I recommend that you request further details on the roadmap and upcoming release. If you are considering buying Synkron Via, I strongly urge you to get more details on recent wins and do set up a meeting with the engineering team on the product, so that you can assess the commitment to the acquired platform.

I'm very interested in further details on Dynamicweb which claims to have more than 4,000 customers.  If you have anything you can share, please leave a comment.

Disclaimer: I’m certainly no financial analyst

Tagged , , | 10 Comments

Annual Report: Sitecore continues rapid growth

Share

Yesterday Danish CMS vendor Sitecore - winners of this year's Web Idol 2008 - released their annual report which documented that the company is continuing their rapid growth. Revenue was up 86% to DKK 56 million and profits are up 216% to DKK 20 million. Sitecore now has 120 employees globally.

On the face of it these figures seem impressive; particularly considering the current rocky and stormy climate. However, a closer look at the annual report threw up a few interesting findings:

  • A significant part of Sitecore is owned by a company called Company Factory, which also owns Sitecore integrator Pentia and another company called Sitecore Foundry. This is documented in Danish on the Pentia site. Company Factory is a holding company and does not have a website with further information. Sitecore Foundry is also the name for a Sitecore solution aimed at making it easy for enterprises to manage microsites.
  • Sitecore announced "that revenues have grown by over 100% over the prior fiscal year 2007-2008" in a press release on Nov 4, but the numbers in the annual report tell a different story. Why exaggerate the good numbers? Perhaps the numbers changed in the audit process? If not, I must be reading or interpreting the numbers wrongly. (CORRECTION - Dec 2: Please see comment below from Sitecore CIO with clarfication)
  • Sitecore owns 49% of their subsidiary in Ukraine and 30% of Sitecore UK. I don't know who owns the remaining parts.

NB: If you want to learn more about Sitecore and exchange experiences with other practitioners you can join the J. Boye groups for web and intranet professionals

Tagged , , | 7 Comments